Three years ago, I wrote that photochromic helmet faceshields were my new favorite piece of motorcycle gear. I still love them. All three helmets I own have a photochromic visor, meaning one that changes tint to match the ambient lighting. They darken in sunlight and become almost perfectly clear in darkness. The convenience is great, because you don’t have to stop and swap faceshields as conditions change, but you do need to know what you’re getting into. Not only are the visors expensive, but they have a limited life span.
The photos below show the evidence.
The fact that these shields eventually lose their tint is no secret. The manufacturers warn you it will happen, though perhaps in finer print than you’d prefer. Still, the change is pretty dramatic.
I should also note that my helmets are stored in ideal conditions for maintaining the shields’ ability to adjust. When some friends redid their kitchen, I got the old cabinets they were going to throw out and installed them in my windowless garage. After every ride, I put my helmet in the soft cloth bag that came with it and put it in the cabinet in the garage. In other words, there are three layers between the helmet and any light. It doesn’t get much darker than that. The manufacturers suggest storing the helmets in darkness to prolong the life of the photochromic shields.
How long your faceshield will last depends — but I would say count on replacing it after two years. I currently have three helmets with photochromic faceshields: A Shoei RF1200 that’s less than a year old, the Bell RS1 this shield is fitted to (both using technology licensed from the makers of Transitions® lenses) and a LaZer Kestrel (no longer available) that RevZilla provided for the original test three years ago. The faceshield on the Kestrel is still much darker than the one on the Bell, but that’s probably because it has seen less use. We’ll see how the one on the Shoei holds up, since that’s my main, go-to helmet and I expect to keep it for a full five years. (See updates below.)
So does this cause me to revise my positive comments about the photochromic visors? No. I still like them and would not want to go back to having to carry a separate shield and change it as light conditions changed. I still appreciate riding through a day of varying weather and always having good vision. But I knew the day would come when there was a price to be paid.
For my Shoei, for example, a tinted shield costs $65 and a Transitions photochromic shield costs $170. If I figure that one tinted shield will last the life of the helmet, but I’ll have to buy two photochromic shields, that’s a total cost of $340, or $275 more than going the traditional route.
Whether the convenience is worth the price to you depends on your budget and personal preferences. Just know what you’re getting into.
Update, June 2020: Since I wrote this post nearly three years ago, I have retired the old LaZer helmet (no longer sold in the U.S. market, as far as I know). The Bell visor has lost all its photochromic function. The Shoei visor, however, is now almost four years old and still working perfectly! So maybe my warning that you should only expect two years out of one of these visors was too pessimistic. That was accurate for the Bell visor, but the Shoei has done much better.
Update, June 2022: The Shoei has now reached the recommended retirement age for a helmet but the photochromic shield is still working. It definitely does not get as dark as it did when it was new, but it still darkens enough to be useful. So while the Bell shield only lasted half the expected useful life of the helmet, the Shoei visor lasted as long as you’re supposed to use the helmet before replacement. That’s really encouraging news for those of us who love the convenience of the photochromic faceshields.
Spurg says try sunglasses.
Considering how ridiculous Spurgeon looks in those sunglasses he wears, imagine how much more ridiculous I would look wearing them.